Click on the "Read More" link for the video.
If you liked this one, Part 3 of the series is also online here, and Part 4 here.
Showing posts with label Eucharist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eucharist. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
EWTN Jewish Roots of the Mass Pt 1 Video
Friday, October 12, 2007
Jesus' Eucharistic Presence: Communion or Cannibalism
I hope the links below are helpful. Remember, though, that not even Jesus was able to help all of His followers understand. When most of the disciples walked away from this hard teaching, Jesus let them, asking the Apostles if they were going to go also.
Accepting Jesus' Presence in the Eucharist is a matter of grace from God. So prayer is the first, middle, and last necessity to bring loved ones into the Truth. Remember also that Jesus is Love, and that by our Love, Christians were recognized and won over converts.
Cannibalism Link 1
Is Jesus Present in the Eucharist?
The Real Presence in John 6: Scroll down to 7th or so entry. The 8th one defines some of the terms...
Science and the Eucharist
Eucharist & Transubstantiation
Transubstantiation & Reason
Link with More Links on the Eucharist
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From http://www.dioceseofknoxville.org/?id=1422&level=1&menu=1417:
Question: I don’t want to sound blasphemous, but if someone were to say it’s cannibalistic to eat and drink Jesus’ body and blood, how should I respond? —J.A.P.
Answer: Our Lord himself did not meet with total acceptance when he taught, “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you” and “my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink.” In fact, following the bread of life discourse (see John 6:22-71), the Gospel tells us that “many of his disciples who were listening said, ‘This saying is hard; who can accept it?’” and “as a result of this, many of his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.”
As the Catechism of the Catholic Church points out, “The Eucharist and the Cross are stumbling blocks. It is the same mystery and it never ceases to be an occasion of division” (CCC No. 1336).
In responding to the question of cannibalism, a Catholic can point out that the sacrament of the holy Eucharist, although truly the body and blood, soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, is given to us under the appearance of bread and wine. In the language of philosophy and theology, the bread and wine retain their “accidents,” that is, they still smell, look, and taste like bread and wine to our senses in order that we may consume them into our body and soul, but in reality, the Eucharist is the whole and complete Christ, the “Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world,” which was foreshadowed in the Old Testament by the Passover lamb that was sacrificed and consumed by God’s people on the occasion of their deliverance from slavery in Egypt.
Christ instituted the Eucharist, the sacrifice of his body and blood, at the Last Supper, in order to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross throughout the ages until he should come again. The Bible and the earliest practice of the church testify that from the time of the apostles, it has been the faith of the church that the holy Eucharist is really the body and blood of Christ.
Thursday, October 11, 2007
John Chapter 7: Agape Bible Study Link and Handout
Click on the Read More Link for the Chapter 7 Handout.
HANDOUT CHAPTER 7
In chapter 6 there were three stumbling blocks which prevented many Jews from coming to Christ:
1) the desire for a “political” Messiah to ease their earthly sufferings
2) the inability to accept the deity of Jesus, God made man
3) the refusal to believe in the Real Presence of Christ the Living Bread come down from heaven.
These are the same 3 stumbling blocks that prevent many people from coming to Christ today.
Did Jesus have brothers and sisters?
The word used in the Greek for brothers is adelphoi, which means “from the womb” and literally means brothers who are born from the same mother. Unfortunately this word has been misunderstood to mean that Joseph and Mary had a marriage relationship after Jesus’ birth that resulted in brothers and sisters. This has never been a teaching of the Church. All the Fathers of the Church maintained that Mary remained a virgin all of her life. The problem is that the sacred writers of the New Testament were writing in Greek but thinking in Hebrew/Aramaic.
There is no separate word for “cousin” in Hebrew or Aramaic. The only way to designate a “cousin” was to indicate that a certain person was the son of your mother’s brother, etc. In Hebrew and Aramaic thought any kinsman, or a countryman, was a “brother.” This peculiarity of the Hebrew language is evident in other passages in the New Testament that are clearly not speaking of blood relationships.
In Acts 1:14 and 16 Peter addresses the 120 disciples [men and women] of Jesus and calls them adelphoi. In Peter’s great homily at the Feast of Pentecost he preaches the risen Christ to the Jewish crowds and calls them adelphoi [Acts 2:29,37]. Later when Peter preaches to the Jew at the Temple he also calls them adelphoi.
Throughout Acts and all of Paul’s and James’ and John’s letters to the Church the New Covenant believers are all refereed to as adelphoi [the plural form can be used to indicate both sisters and brothers / male and female kinsman]. The point is, in the New Testament the Greek word adelphoi is being used in the Hebrew sense of kinsman/ kinswoman, or Covenant brother or sister. We know from the Bible and other sources that Jesus had several kinsmen who became prominent in the Jerusalem New Covenant Church. Both James and Simon became Bishops of Jerusalem [according to tradition they were a stepbrother and a cousin to Jesus].
Both Jesus’ kinsmen James and Jude wrote books of the New Testament that bears their names. If Mary had other sons it would have been inconceivable that Jesus would have left her in the care of John at the foot of the cross instead of telling John to make sure that another son cared for her. It is clear that these men are kinsmen of Jesus’ family who know of and have seen His miracles. [For more information on this subject I recommend Karl Keating’s book, Catholicism and Fundamentalism, pages 282-289. Also, click to see: This Rock Magazine, September 2003 “Bad Aramaic Made Easy: There is No Word for ‘Cousin’ , pages 18-22].
These passages parallel the Temptation of Jesus by Satan
Expectations for Jesus in John 6:15-7:3
Temptation of Jesus in Matthew & Luke
6:15: The people want to make Jesus king
Satan offers Him the kingdoms of the world
[Matthew 4:8-10; Luke 4:5-8]
6:31: The people ask for miraculous bread
Satan invites Jesus to turn the stones into bread
[Matthew 4:3-4; Luke 4:3-4]
7:3: The kinsmen of Jesus want Him to go
to
Satan takes Jesus to
Him to display His power by jumping from
the pinnacle of the
Luke 4:9-12]
These are the same temptations, more subtly presented, but still the same. Once again Jesus successfully resists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
